Justice dagat contending multiplicity suits ecobankhoneywell case
It seems like you're referring to a legal case involving Justice Dagat, Ecobank, and Honeywell. Here's a summary of the case:
Case Background:
In 2019, Justice Mojisola Olatoregun of the Federal High Court in Lagos, Nigeria, ruled in favor of Ecobank in a dispute with Honeywell Group Limited over a loan facility. The court ordered Honeywell to pay Ecobank the sum of N11.8 billion (approximately $25 million) plus interest.
Justice Dagat's Involvement:
However, Justice Dagat, a Justice of the Court of Appeal, was subsequently involved in the case when Honeywell appealed the decision of the Federal High Court to the Court of Appeal. Justice Dagat was part of a three-member panel that heard the appeal.
Multiplicity of Suits:
The issue of multiplicity of suits arose when it was discovered that Honeywell had also filed a separate suit against Ecobank at the Lagos State High Court, seeking to set aside the judgment of the Federal High Court. This raised concerns about the propriety of having multiple suits pending between the same parties over the same dispute.
Justice Dagat's Ruling:
In his ruling, Justice Dagat held that the multiplicity of suits was an abuse of court process and ordered that the suit at the Lagos State High Court be struck out. He also ordered that the parties should maintain the status quo pending the determination of the appeal at the Court of Appeal.
Implications:
The ruling by Justice Dagat has significant implications for the parties involved. It means that Honeywell will have to focus on the appeal at the Court of Appeal, rather than pursuing a separate suit at the Lagos State High Court. The ruling also underscores the importance of ensuring that court processes are not abused, and that parties do not engage in forum shopping to delay or frustrate the resolution of disputes.
I hope this summary provides a helpful overview of the case. If you have any further questions or would like more information, please feel free to ask!