New growth theory of economic development
The New Growth Theory (NGT) of economic development is a theoretical framework that explains economic growth and development in terms of the accumulation of knowledge and innovation. It was developed in the 1980s by economists such as Paul Romer, Robert Lucas, and Edward Prescott, and has since become a dominant paradigm in the field of economics.
Key Assumptions:
- Knowledge is the key driver of growth: NGT argues that economic growth is driven by the accumulation of knowledge, rather than the traditional factors of production such as labor and capital.
- Innovation is the source of growth: NGT emphasizes the importance of innovation in driving economic growth. Innovation can take many forms, including the development of new products, processes, and organizational structures.
- Increasing returns to scale: NGT assumes that there are increasing returns to scale in the production of knowledge and innovation. This means that as more knowledge is accumulated, the marginal productivity of that knowledge increases.
- Endogenous growth: NGT is an endogenous growth theory, meaning that economic growth is driven by internal factors within the economy, rather than external factors such as technological progress or changes in the terms of trade.
Key Components:
- Human capital: NGT emphasizes the importance of human capital, including education and training, in driving economic growth.
- Research and development (R&D): NGT highlights the role of R&D in driving innovation and economic growth.
- Spillovers and externalities: NGT recognizes that innovation and knowledge can have positive spillovers and externalities, which can lead to increased economic growth.
- Institutional factors: NGT emphasizes the importance of institutional factors, such as property rights, the rule of law, and the regulatory environment, in facilitating innovation and economic growth.
Implications:
- Government policy: NGT suggests that government policy can play a role in promoting economic growth by investing in education, R&D, and infrastructure, and by creating an environment that encourages innovation and entrepreneurship.
- International trade: NGT suggests that international trade can facilitate the diffusion of knowledge and innovation across countries, leading to increased economic growth.
- Inequality: NGT suggests that economic growth can lead to increased inequality, as those who are already well-educated and well-connected may have an advantage in accessing new knowledge and innovation.
Criticisms:
- Overemphasis on knowledge: Some critics argue that NGT overemphasizes the role of knowledge and innovation in driving economic growth, and neglects the importance of other factors such as labor and capital.
- Lack of empirical evidence: Some critics argue that there is limited empirical evidence to support the claims of NGT, and that the theory may not be as robust as claimed.
- Inadequate treatment of institutions: Some critics argue that NGT does not adequately account for the role of institutions in facilitating innovation and economic growth.
Overall, the New Growth Theory provides a framework for understanding the role of knowledge and innovation in driving economic growth and development. While it has been influential in shaping economic policy and research, it is not without its criticisms and limitations.