Giving and misgivings fg loans discordant with public sensibility

It seems like you're discussing the concept of giving and receiving loans, and how it can be discordant with public sensibility. Here's a breakdown of your statement:

• "Giving and misgivings": This phrase suggests that there may be some reservations or doubts about lending or borrowing money.
• "FG loans": I'm assuming "FG" stands for "financial gifts" or "favors," which implies that the loans being referred to are not necessarily formal, structured loans, but rather informal agreements or favors.
• "Discordant with public sensibility": This phrase suggests that the practice of giving and receiving FG loans may not align with the values or norms of the general public.

Some possible interpretations of your statement could be:

• The public may view FG loans as unfair or exploitative, as they may not be based on formal agreements or interest rates.
• The practice of giving and receiving FG loans may create social and economic inequalities, as those who have access to these loans may have an advantage over those who do not.
• The lack of transparency and formalization in FG loans may lead to misunderstandings, conflicts, and even legal issues.

To better understand your statement, could you provide more context or clarify what you mean by "FG loans" and how they are discordant with public sensibility?