Breaking court stops multichoice from increasing dstv subscription rates

I think there may be some confusion here.

Breaking news is not a court order that stops Multichoice from increasing DSTV subscription rates. Instead, "breaking news" refers to sudden and unexpected news that is reported immediately, often through various media channels.

If you're referring to a court order that prevents Multichoice from increasing DSTV subscription rates, I'm not aware of any specific instance where this has happened. Multichoice, the parent company of DSTV, is a private entity that sets its own pricing and subscription rates for its services.

However, it's possible that you may be referring to a regulatory body or a court ruling that has imposed certain restrictions or regulations on Multichoice's pricing practices. For example, the Independent Communications Authority of South Africa (ICASA) has the power to regulate the broadcasting industry, including the pricing of subscription services like DSTV.

If you could provide more context or clarify what you mean by "breaking court stops multichoice from increasing dstv subscription rates", I'd be happy to try and help you further.