Bashirs arrest south african defends inaction

You're referring to the controversy surrounding the arrest of Bashir, the President of Sudan, in South Africa.

In June 2015, President Omar al-Bashir of Sudan was invited to attend the African Union (AU) Summit in Johannesburg, South Africa. However, he was also wanted by the International Criminal Court (ICC) for war crimes, genocide, and crimes against humanity committed in Darfur.

Despite the ICC's warrant for his arrest, Bashir was allowed to leave South Africa without being detained or arrested. This decision sparked widespread criticism and outrage, with many accusing South Africa of violating its international obligations and undermining the rule of law.

In response to the backlash, the South African government defended its decision, citing several reasons:

1. Sovereignty: South Africa argued that it had a duty to respect the sovereignty of the AU and its member states, including Sudan. The government claimed that it was not the role of South Africa to enforce the ICC's arrest warrant, especially since the AU had not requested Bashir's arrest.
2. African solutions for African problems: The South African government emphasized the importance of finding African solutions to African problems. In this case, they believed that the AU and the African Union Commission (AUC) were better equipped to address the situation in Darfur and Sudan, rather than the ICC.
3. Non-interference: South Africa argued that it was not its place to interfere in the internal affairs of another country, including Sudan. The government claimed that it was not responsible for enforcing the ICC's arrest warrant, especially since it was not a party to the Rome Statute, which established the ICC.
4. Diplomatic immunity: The South African government also claimed that Bashir enjoyed diplomatic immunity as the head of state of Sudan, and that he was therefore not subject to arrest or detention.

These arguments were met with criticism from many quarters, including human rights organizations, opposition parties, and some African countries. The ICC, in particular, condemned South Africa's decision, stating that it was a violation of the court's authority and a setback for international justice.

The controversy surrounding Bashir's arrest in South Africa highlights the complex and often contentious issues surrounding international justice, sovereignty, and the role of African countries in addressing conflicts and human rights abuses on the continent.