Wike appellate court throws out allegations against thugs others

It seems like you're referring to a news article or a court decision. Here's a possible summary:

The Appellate Court has thrown out allegations against thugs and others, ruling that the evidence presented was insufficient to support the charges. The court's decision is a significant setback for the prosecution, which had accused the defendants of various crimes, including [list specific crimes].

The court's ruling is based on the fact that the prosecution failed to provide sufficient evidence to prove the defendants' guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The court found that the evidence presented was circumstantial and did not meet the required standard of proof.

The defendants, who were accused of [list specific crimes], had maintained their innocence throughout the trial. They argued that the prosecution's case was based on flawed evidence and that they were victims of a miscarriage of justice.

The court's decision is a victory for the defendants, who are now free to go. The ruling is also a blow to the prosecution, which had been seeking to convict the defendants of serious crimes.

It's worth noting that the court's decision is not final and the prosecution may choose to appeal the ruling.