Why buhari cant be tight lipped over immunity proposal by the 8th national assembly
I think there may be a few assumptions in your question that need to be clarified.
Firstly, it's important to note that the 8th National Assembly of Nigeria was dissolved in 2019, and President Muhammadu Buhari is still the President of Nigeria.
That being said, I'll try to provide some context and insights to address your question.
The "immunity proposal" you're referring to is likely the attempt by the 8th National Assembly to amend the Constitution to remove the immunity clause that protects serving presidents and governors from prosecution while in office. This proposal was met with resistance from President Buhari and his administration, who argued that it was an attempt to undermine the powers of the executive branch.
Now, as to why President Buhari may not be "tight-lipped" over this proposal, here are a few possible reasons:
- Constitutional implications: As the President, Buhari has a constitutional duty to protect the interests of the executive branch and ensure that the powers of the office are not diminished. He may believe that removing the immunity clause would undermine the stability and effectiveness of the government.
- Political implications: The proposal was seen as a political move by the opposition parties to weaken the ruling party and gain an advantage in the 2019 elections. As the President, Buhari may have seen this as an attempt to undermine his administration and the ruling party's chances of winning the elections.
- Personal interests: Some critics have suggested that Buhari may have personal interests in maintaining the immunity clause, as it protects him from prosecution for alleged human rights abuses and corruption during his time in office.
- National security concerns: The President may have concerns about the potential impact of removing the immunity clause on national security. He may believe that it could create instability and undermine the authority of the government.
In summary, President Buhari's opposition to the immunity proposal was likely driven by a combination of constitutional, political, personal, and national security concerns.