Unga 2018 trumps speech puts him at odds with the un

You're referring to the 73rd session of the United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) in 2018, where President Donald Trump delivered a speech that was widely reported to have put him at odds with the UN.

On September 25, 2018, President Trump addressed the UN General Assembly, delivering a speech that was marked by controversy and criticism from many quarters. Here are some key points from the speech that contributed to the backlash:

1. Withdrawal from the Iran nuclear deal: Trump announced that the United States would withdraw from the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, which was negotiated by the Obama administration and other world powers. This move was seen as a significant departure from the international community's efforts to address the Iranian nuclear program.
2. Criticism of the UN: Trump criticized the UN, saying that it was "not a friend of democracy" and that it was "so sad" that the organization was "wasting its time and energy on issues that have nothing to do with peace and security." He also accused the UN of being "anti-Israel" and "anti-Semitic."
3. Defense of nationalism: Trump emphasized the importance of nationalism, saying that "we must reject the ideology of globalism" and "put our own citizens first." This rhetoric was seen as a departure from the traditional UN emphasis on international cooperation and multilateralism.
4. Climate change: Trump's speech did not mention climate change, which was a significant omission given the UN's efforts to address the issue. The speech was seen as a snub to the UN's climate change agenda and a rejection of the scientific consensus on the issue.
5. Tone and language: Trump's speech was marked by a confrontational tone and language, which was seen as divisive and unhelpful in promoting international cooperation.

The reaction to Trump's speech was swift and widespread. Many world leaders, including those from the European Union, Canada, and Australia, criticized the speech as divisive and unhelpful. The UN Secretary-General, António Guterres, also expressed disappointment with the speech, saying that it did not reflect the values of the UN.

The speech was seen as a significant departure from the traditional tone and language used by US presidents at the UN General Assembly, and it marked a new low point in US-UN relations.