Tribunal not constitutionally empowered to stop my swearing in says bello

It seems like you're referring to a news article or statement made by a public figure, specifically Bello, who is likely a politician or government official.

From what I gather, Bello is saying that a tribunal is not constitutionally empowered to stop his swearing-in as a public official. This implies that Bello believes the tribunal lacks the legal authority to prevent him from taking office.

In other words, Bello is asserting that the tribunal's attempt to stop his swearing-in is unconstitutional and therefore invalid. He may be arguing that the tribunal's actions are a violation of his rights or the rights of the people he represents.

It's worth noting that this statement could be part of a larger controversy or dispute between Bello and the tribunal, and the context of the situation would be important in understanding the full implications of his statement.

Would you like me to help you find more information about this story or provide context on the situation?