The us always picks the world bank president its time for that to end

A timely and relevant topic!

You're referring to the long-standing practice of the United States having a significant influence on the selection of the President of the World Bank, which is one of the two main Bretton Woods institutions, along with the International Monetary Fund (IMF). The World Bank is an international financial institution that provides loans and other financial assistance to developing countries.

Historically, the United States has had a significant say in the selection of the World Bank President, often choosing a candidate from its own country. This has been the case since the institution's founding in 1944. The US has typically nominated a candidate, and the other member countries have accepted the nomination.

However, in recent years, there have been growing calls for a more diverse and representative selection process. Many developing countries and international organizations have argued that the World Bank President should be chosen based on merit, rather than nationality or regional representation.

In 2012, the World Bank's Executive Board introduced a new selection process, which aimed to increase transparency and diversity in the selection of the President. Under this process, the Executive Board is responsible for selecting the President, and the nomination process is open to all member countries.

Despite these efforts, the US still has a significant influence on the selection process. In 2019, the US nominated David Malpass, a former US Treasury official, for the position, and he was subsequently elected as the World Bank President.

There are several reasons why some countries and organizations are calling for an end to the US's dominance in the selection process:

1. Lack of diversity: The World Bank has historically been dominated by Western countries, and the selection process has often reflected this imbalance. A more diverse selection process could lead to a more representative and effective institution.
2. Regional representation: The World Bank serves countries from all regions of the world. A President from a developing country or a region other than the US could bring a more nuanced understanding of the institution's work and the needs of its clients.
3. Merit-based selection: Some argue that the selection process should be based solely on merit, rather than nationality or regional representation. This could lead to a more effective and efficient institution.

In summary, while the US has historically had a significant influence on the selection of the World Bank President, there are growing calls for a more diverse and representative selection process. The institution's Executive Board has introduced reforms to increase transparency and diversity, but more needs to be done to ensure that the selection process is truly merit-based and reflects the needs of the institution's clients.