Tag us begin talks with can over allegations of religious and sectional partisanship trailing kerrys visit

Here's a possible start to a conversation:

Moderator: Good evening, everyone. We're here to discuss the recent visit by Senator John Kerry to the Middle East. The trip has sparked controversy, with some accusing Kerry of showing religious and sectional partisanship. Let's start with our first guest, Can, who has been vocal about his concerns. Can, can you tell us more about what you're concerned about and why you think Kerry's visit was problematic?

Can: Thank you, Moderator. Yes, I'm concerned that Kerry's visit was overly focused on the Christian minority in the region, and that he failed to address the concerns of the majority Muslim population. It's not just about the religious aspect, but also the fact that his visit was seen as a clear attempt to curry favor with the Christian community, which is a significant voting bloc in the United States. This kind of partisanship is exactly what we need to avoid in international diplomacy.

Moderator: That's a interesting perspective, Can. Senator Kerry's office has responded by saying that his visit was focused on promoting peace and stability in the region, and that he met with representatives from all faiths. Can you respond to that?

Can: I understand that, but the optics of the visit were all wrong. Kerry met with the patriarch of the Melkite Greek Catholic Church, but didn't meet with any Muslim leaders or representatives. That's not balanced diplomacy, that's pandering to a specific group. And let's not forget that the Christian minority in the region is already a significant recipient of aid and support from the United States. It's not like they're being neglected or marginalized.

Moderator: Interesting points, Can. Now, let's hear from our next guest, who has a different perspective on the visit.