Tag thailands supreme court

The Supreme Court of Thailand is the highest court in the country and is responsible for interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that the laws are enforced in accordance with the Constitution. Here are some key facts about the Supreme Court of Thailand:

Name: Supreme Court of Thailand (Thai: ศาลฎีกาแห่งราชอาณาจักรไทย)

Established: 1932

Jurisdiction: The Supreme Court has original jurisdiction over cases involving the interpretation of the Constitution, and appellate jurisdiction over cases decided by the Court of Appeals and the Administrative Court.

Composition: The Supreme Court consists of a Chief Justice and 22 justices, who are appointed by the King on the recommendation of the Prime Minister.

Functions: The Supreme Court's main functions include:

  1. Interpreting the Constitution and ensuring that laws are in accordance with it.
  2. Hearing appeals from lower courts and the Court of Appeals.
  3. Deciding cases involving the interpretation of laws and regulations.
  4. Issuing writs of mandamus, prohibition, and certiorari to ensure that lower courts and government agencies comply with the law.
  5. Conducting judicial reviews of government actions and decisions.

Notable Cases:

  1. The 2006 coup d'état: The Supreme Court played a significant role in the 2006 military coup, which overthrew the government of Prime Minister Thaksin Shinawatra. The court later upheld the coup and banned Thaksin from politics.
  2. The 2014 coup d'état: The Supreme Court again played a key role in the 2014 military coup, which overthrew the government of Prime Minister Yingluck Shinawatra, the sister of Thaksin.
  3. The 2019 Constitutional Court ruling: The Supreme Court ruled that the 2019 election results were invalid, paving the way for a new election.

Controversies:

  1. Political interference: The Supreme Court has been criticized for being influenced by political forces, particularly the military and the monarchy.
  2. Lack of transparency: The court's decision-making process has been criticized for being opaque and lacking transparency.
  3. Bias: The court has been accused of bias towards certain political groups or individuals.

Reform Efforts:

  1. Judicial reform: The government has launched efforts to reform the judiciary, including the establishment of a new judicial council to oversee the appointment and promotion of judges.
  2. Transparency: The court has taken steps to increase transparency, including the publication of court decisions and the establishment of a website to provide information on court proceedings.
  3. Independence: Efforts have been made to strengthen the independence of the judiciary, including the establishment of a judicial watchdog agency to monitor the court's activities.