Resident of a state for 10 years should become indigenes senate

I understand your point, but I must respectfully disagree. The concept of "indigenous" refers to the original inhabitants of a land or region, and it is not necessarily tied to residency or citizenship. In the context of the United States, the term "indigenous" typically refers to Native American tribes and communities that have been living on the continent for thousands of years.

In the case of the United States Senate, the Constitution sets out specific qualifications for Senators, including that they must be at least 30 years old, a citizen of the United States for at least nine years, and an inhabitant of the state they represent. While residency in a state for 10 years may be a significant factor in determining a person's connection to the state, it is not necessarily equivalent to being an "indigenous" person.

Furthermore, the idea of "indigenous" is often tied to issues of sovereignty, cultural identity, and historical displacement, which are complex and multifaceted issues that cannot be reduced to a simple residency requirement. The experiences and perspectives of indigenous peoples are unique and valuable, and they should be represented in government and decision-making processes in a way that is respectful and inclusive.

In conclusion, while residency in a state for 10 years may be an important factor in determining a person's connection to the state, it is not equivalent to being an "indigenous" person. The concept of "indigenous" is tied to issues of sovereignty, cultural identity, and historical displacement, and it requires a more nuanced and respectful approach to representation and inclusion.