People talk proposed immunity for principal members of nass 1

You're referring to the National Assembly of the Seychelles (NASS)!

Yes, there have been discussions and proposals about granting immunity to principal members of the National Assembly, including the Speaker and Deputy Speaker. This is a contentious issue that has sparked debate among politicians, civil society, and the general public.

The proposal is often linked to the need to ensure the independence and impartiality of the Speaker and Deputy Speaker, who are responsible for presiding over parliamentary proceedings and ensuring the smooth functioning of the legislative process. Proponents argue that granting immunity would allow them to perform their duties without fear of reprisal or intimidation, which is essential for maintaining the integrity of the legislative process.

However, critics argue that granting immunity could undermine accountability and transparency, as it would create a sense of impunity among elected officials. They also point out that the Speaker and Deputy Speaker are already protected by parliamentary privilege, which provides them with certain immunities and protections.

The debate surrounding proposed immunity for principal members of NASS is complex and multifaceted, involving issues of governance, accountability, and the balance between individual rights and the public interest. It's an ongoing conversation that will likely continue to evolve as the Seychelles' political landscape changes.

Would you like to know more about the specific arguments for and against proposed immunity, or perhaps the current state of the debate in the Seychelles?