Military debunks amnesty international report giwa barracks

It appears that you're referring to a recent controversy surrounding a report by Amnesty International (AI) on the alleged human rights abuses at Giwa Barracks in Maiduguri, Nigeria.

For those who may not be aware, Giwa Barracks is a military facility in Maiduguri, the capital of Borno State in northeastern Nigeria, where the Nigerian military has been battling Boko Haram insurgents.

On February 9, 2017, Amnesty International released a report titled "Starving Children, Burning Homes: Denial of Humanitarian Access in Northeast Nigeria," which accused the Nigerian military of committing war crimes, including extrajudicial killings, torture, and forced displacement of civilians, particularly in the Giwa Barracks area.

However, the Nigerian military has since disputed the findings of the report, calling it "false, misleading, and biased." In a statement, the Nigerian Army's Director of Public Relations, Brigadier General Sani Usman, said that the report was "based on unverified information" and that the military had taken steps to address the allegations.

The military has also accused AI of being "anti-Nigeria" and of having a "hidden agenda" to discredit the country's military efforts against Boko Haram.

It's worth noting that the Nigerian government has also denied the allegations made by AI, with the Minister of Defence, Mansur Dan-Ali, saying that the report was "baseless" and "untrue."

The controversy surrounding the report has sparked a heated debate about the role of human rights organizations in conflict zones and the challenges of verifying information in areas where access is restricted.

What would you like to know more about this topic?