Kizz daniels name change doesnt absolve him from court case g worldwide

You're referring to the controversy surrounding Kizz Daniel's name change and its implications on his court case with G-Worldwide Entertainment.

For the uninitiated, Kizz Daniel (formerly known as Kiss Daniel) was signed to G-Worldwide Entertainment, a record label owned by Emperor Music, in 2013. However, in 2017, Kizz Daniel and his team claimed that the contract was invalid and that he was no longer bound by its terms. G-Worldwide Entertainment, on the other hand, maintained that the contract was still valid and that Kizz Daniel owed the label royalties and other obligations.

In 2018, G-Worldwide Entertainment filed a lawsuit against Kizz Daniel, seeking damages and an injunction to prevent him from performing or releasing music without their permission. Kizz Daniel, now known as Kizz Daniel, has continued to release music and perform, despite the lawsuit.

The question is, does Kizz Daniel's name change absolve him from the court case? The answer is no. A name change does not automatically terminate a contractual obligation or a legal dispute. The court case is based on the alleged breach of contract and other legal issues, not on Kizz Daniel's name.

In fact, G-Worldwide Entertainment has argued that Kizz Daniel's name change is an attempt to evade the court's jurisdiction and avoid paying the debts he owes to the label. The label has also claimed that Kizz Daniel's new stage name is still subject to the original contract and that he is still bound by its terms.

The court case is ongoing, and it remains to be seen how it will be resolved. However, it's clear that Kizz Daniel's name change does not provide a legal shield against the allegations made by G-Worldwide Entertainment.