Differentiate between classical and new trade theories captured on innovation

Classical trade theory and new trade theory differ in their perspectives on innovation and its impact on international trade. Here's a summary of the key differences:

Classical Trade Theory (CTT)

New Trade Theory (NTT)

Key differences:

  1. Innovation: CTT does not consider innovation as a driving force behind trade, while NTT sees innovation as a key factor in shaping international trade.
  2. Technology: CTT assumes that technology is exogenous, while NTT recognizes that innovation can be influenced by trade and globalization.
  3. Specialization: CTT predicts that countries will specialize in producing goods for which they have a comparative advantage, while NTT suggests that innovation can create new opportunities for specialization and trade.
  4. Gains from trade: CTT predicts that trade will lead to a more efficient allocation of resources, while NTT predicts that trade will lead to a more rapid pace of innovation and economic growth.

Examples of how innovation has influenced international trade:

  1. Global value chains: The rise of global value chains has enabled firms to specialize in specific stages of production, leading to increased trade and innovation.
  2. Digital trade: The growth of digital trade has created new opportunities for innovation and trade, as firms can now easily export digital goods and services across borders.
  3. Biotechnology: The development of biotechnology has led to new opportunities for trade and innovation in the pharmaceutical and agricultural sectors.

In conclusion, while classical trade theory focuses on comparative advantage and assumes that technology is exogenous, new trade theory recognizes the role of innovation and technological progress in shaping international trade. The differences between these two theories have important implications for our understanding of the benefits and challenges of international trade.