Danjuma comment is an invitation to anarchy defence minister

It seems like you're referring to a recent controversy surrounding the Nigerian Defence Minister, Major General Bashir Magashi (Rtd), and a comment made by a former Nigerian international footballer, Danjuma.

For those who may not be aware, Danjuma had made a statement suggesting that Nigerians should defend themselves against bandits and kidnappers, as the government seemed unable to do so effectively. This comment sparked a heated debate, with some people interpreting it as an invitation to anarchy.

However, it's important to note that Danjuma's comment was likely made in frustration and desperation, rather than as a genuine call to anarchy. Many Nigerians have indeed felt helpless and vulnerable in the face of rising insecurity, and Danjuma's statement may have been an expression of that sentiment.

As for the Defence Minister's response, it's understandable that he would want to caution against any perceived calls to anarchy or vigilantism. The government has a responsibility to maintain law and order, and it's crucial that citizens do not take the law into their own hands.

In an ideal world, the government would be able to provide adequate security and protection to its citizens, but unfortunately, this is not always the case. In such situations, it's essential for citizens to work together with the government to find solutions, rather than resorting to anarchy or vigilantism.

What are your thoughts on this issue? Do you think Danjuma's comment was an invitation to anarchy, or was it a genuine expression of frustration and desperation?