Court judgements making new presidents

I think there may be some confusion here!

To clarify, court judgments do not typically make new presidents. In most countries, including the United States, the process of electing a president is governed by the country's constitution and laws, and is typically carried out through a democratic process involving voters, political parties, and other stakeholders.

In the United States, for example, the president is elected through the Electoral College system, where voters in each state cast ballots for their preferred candidate, and the candidate who receives the majority of the electoral votes (at least 270 out of 538) wins the presidency.

If a president is removed from office through impeachment and conviction, or if a vacancy occurs due to the death or resignation of the president, the process of succession is triggered, which typically involves the Vice President taking over as Acting President until a new president is elected or inaugurated.

In rare cases, a court may issue a ruling that affects the outcome of a presidential election or the legitimacy of a president's term in office. For example, a court might declare an election invalid or order a recount due to irregularities or fraud. However, even in such cases, the court's decision would not directly install a new president.

If you're thinking of a specific scenario or case where a court judgment led to the installation of a new president, I'd be happy to help clarify or provide more information!