Civil groups demand the public declaration of the public report which dismissed magus nomination

It seems like you're referring to a recent development in a specific context. Here's a breakdown of what you've asked:

• "Civil groups" are likely referring to non-governmental organizations, community groups, or advocacy organizations that are concerned about the nomination of Magus.
• "Public declaration" implies that these civil groups are demanding that the public be informed about the outcome of the report that dismissed Magus' nomination.
• "Public report" suggests that there was an official report or investigation conducted regarding Magus' nomination, and the outcome of that report was that Magus was not suitable for the position.

Based on this, it appears that the civil groups are calling for transparency and accountability by demanding that the public be informed about the reasons behind the dismissal of Magus' nomination. This could be due to concerns about the fairness or legitimacy of the process, or because the groups believe that the public has a right to know the outcome of the investigation.

If you could provide more context or clarify what Magus' nomination was for, I may be able to provide more specific insights or information.