Asuu warning strike illegal act of corruption fg

A very timely and relevant topic!

The ongoing warning strike by the Academic Staff Union of Universities (ASUU) has sparked a heated debate about the legality and morality of the strike. While ASUU is demanding better working conditions, improved funding for universities, and the implementation of the 2009 FGN-ASUU agreement, the Federal Government (FG) has accused the union of engaging in an illegal strike.

Here are some arguments for and against the legality of the strike:

Arguments for the legality of the strike:

  1. Right to collective bargaining: ASUU has the right to engage in collective bargaining with the FG to negotiate better working conditions and salaries for its members. The strike is a legitimate means of exercising this right.
  2. Unfulfilled agreements: The FG has failed to implement the 2009 FGN-ASUU agreement, which was meant to address the issues of funding, infrastructure, and staff welfare in universities. ASUU's strike is a response to this breach of agreement.
  3. Public interest: The strike is not just about ASUU's interests, but also about the quality of education in Nigeria. The FG's failure to fund universities adequately has led to a decline in the quality of education, and the strike is a way to draw attention to this issue.

Arguments against the legality of the strike:

  1. Illegal strike: The FG has argued that ASUU's strike is illegal because it was called without following the necessary procedures and protocols. ASUU has been accused of not giving adequate notice to the FG before calling the strike.
  2. Disruption of academic activities: The strike has disrupted academic activities in universities, causing inconvenience to students and parents. The FG has argued that the strike is illegal because it is causing harm to innocent students and the general public.
  3. Corruption allegations: The FG has accused ASUU of engaging in corrupt practices, such as embezzling funds meant for the universities. The strike has been seen as a way to distract from these allegations and avoid accountability.

Corruption allegations:

The FG has accused ASUU of engaging in corrupt practices, including embezzling funds meant for the universities. These allegations have been denied by ASUU, but they have raised concerns about the union's accountability and transparency.

Conclusion:

The legality of the ASUU strike is a complex issue that requires careful consideration of the facts and the law. While ASUU has the right to engage in collective bargaining and strike, the FG has a responsibility to provide a conducive environment for academic activities. The strike has raised important questions about the funding and management of universities in Nigeria, and it is essential that both parties engage in constructive dialogue to resolve the issues.

In the meantime, the FG should take concrete steps to address the concerns raised by ASUU, including implementing the 2009 FGN-ASUU agreement and providing adequate funding for universities. ASUU, on the other hand, should ensure that its strike is peaceful and does not cause unnecessary harm to students and the general public.