Analysis trump intel sharing likely to leave allies anxious

The article suggests that the way President Trump shares intelligence with allies is likely to leave them anxious. Here's a breakdown of the potential concerns:

  1. Unpredictability: Trump's approach to intelligence sharing may be unpredictable, making it difficult for allies to know what to expect. This unpredictability can create uncertainty and anxiety among allies.
  2. Lack of transparency: Trump's administration has been criticized for not being transparent about its intelligence gathering and sharing practices. This lack of transparency can lead to mistrust and anxiety among allies.
  3. Selective sharing: Trump has been known to share intelligence selectively, which can create concerns among allies that they are not being fully informed or that the US is prioritizing its own interests over those of its allies.
  4. Unverified information: Trump has been accused of sharing unverified or false information, which can lead to anxiety among allies who may not have the same level of access to intelligence or the same understanding of the situation.
  5. Erosion of trust: The way Trump shares intelligence can erode trust among allies, making it more difficult for them to work together effectively on intelligence matters.
  6. Different priorities: Trump's administration has different priorities than previous administrations, which can lead to anxiety among allies who may not share the same priorities or values.
  7. Lack of coordination: The way Trump shares intelligence may not be coordinated with other government agencies or international partners, which can lead to confusion and anxiety among allies.
  8. Risk of leaks: The way Trump shares intelligence can increase the risk of leaks, which can compromise national security and create anxiety among allies.

Overall, the article suggests that the way Trump shares intelligence with allies is likely to leave them anxious due to the unpredictability, lack of transparency, selective sharing, unverified information, erosion of trust, different priorities, lack of coordination, and risk of leaks.