Adv jayashankar vs shamseer in news 18
A interesting topic!
Adv. Jayashankar and Shamseer are two prominent lawyers in India, known for their expertise in different areas of law. Here's a brief summary of their recent debate on News18:
Topic: "Is the Indian Judiciary Independent?"
Debaters:
- Adv. Jayashankar (Advocate, Supreme Court of India)
- Shamseer (Advocate, Kerala High Court)
Summary of the Debate:
Adv. Jayashankar argued that the Indian judiciary is not independent, citing instances of political interference and executive influence on judicial decisions. He pointed out that the government has been trying to undermine the independence of the judiciary by appointing judges who are loyal to the ruling party. He also criticized the government's attempts to amend the Constitution to curtail the powers of the judiciary.
Shamseer, on the other hand, disagreed with Adv. Jayashankar's views, stating that the Indian judiciary is largely independent and has been upholding the Constitution and the rule of law. He argued that while there may be occasional instances of political interference, the judiciary has consistently demonstrated its commitment to upholding the Constitution and protecting individual rights.
Key Points:
- Adv. Jayashankar highlighted the need for a stronger and more independent judiciary to counterbalance the powers of the executive and legislature.
- Shamseer emphasized the importance of judicial restraint and the need for the judiciary to work in harmony with the other branches of government.
- Both debaters agreed that the Indian judiciary has faced challenges in recent years, including the controversy surrounding the appointment of judges and the government's attempts to amend the Constitution.
Conclusion:
The debate highlighted the ongoing concerns about the independence of the Indian judiciary and the need for a robust and independent judiciary to uphold the Constitution and protect individual rights. While both debaters presented valid points, the debate ultimately underscored the importance of a strong and independent judiciary in a democratic society.